Mesorat%20hashas for Pesachim 119:14

הא בעבודה אחת כגון בשחיטה דמהניא ביה מחשבת אוכלין פסול והא קיימא לן מקצת אוכלין לא פסלא

for uncircumcised<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' 'Uncircumcised' in this connection always means men whose brothers had died through circumcision, and they were afraid of a similar fate. These may not eat thereof, ibid. 48.');">¹⁴</span> or for unclean persons,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who may likewise not eat it, being forbidden all sacred flesh. Lev. XXII, 4ff.');">¹⁵</span> it is disqualified. Now here it obviously refers to one service, and since the second clause refers to one service, the first clause too treats [also] of service!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The Mishnahs printed on ');">¹⁶</span> - What argument is this? The one is according to its nature, while the other is according to its nature; the second clause [certainly] refers [only] to one service, while the first clause may refer either to o service or to two services.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., either also to one service or exclusively to two services. And the question is, to which?');">¹⁷</span> Come and hear: [If he killed it] for those who can eat it and for those who cannot eat it, it is fit. How is meant? Shall we say, at two services:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Thus: at the slaughtering he declared that it was for those who can eat, and at the sprinkling he declared that it was for those who cannot eat');">¹⁸</span> and the reason [that it is fit] is because he intended it [for non-eate at the sprinkling, for there can be no [effective] intention of eaters at the sprinkling;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., an intention with respect to the eaters expressed at the sprinkling is of no account.');">¹⁹</span> hence [if it were] at one service, e.g. at the slaughtering, where an intention with reference to eaters is effective, it would be disqualified, but we have an established law that if some are eaters it is not disqualified?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since even if only one desired to eat of it the whole animal must be killed, v. infra 61a.');">²⁰</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Pesachim 119:14. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.